The Budget and Appropriations Committee shall be comprised of five full-time members, and shall convene between February 1 and August 1 of each year, and at any other time during the year that the President of the Board determines in writing. Unless otherwise designated by the President, the members of the subcommittee Budget and Appropriations Committee shall include the three members of the Budget and Finance Committee. By March 1 each year, the chair of the Budget and Appropriations Committee shall introduce a motion for consideration by the Board, delineating the budget process for the coming months, including but not limited to: the Committee's anticipated hearing topics from March through June; the process for the Board to identify and publicly communicate its policy priorities for the budget; whether the Board will schedule Committees of the Whole to hold hearings on the Mayor's budget instructions, the Mayor's budget priorities, the Mayor's proposed budget, the Board's proposed spending plan, or other topics; and the Committee's guidelines regarding public transparency and decision-making.
City Hall 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102
Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. (between February 1st and August 1st annually)
Locunity is a independent informational service and is not an official government page for this commission.We use AI-assisted analysis and human editorial review to publish information.
Dignity Fund CoalitionBudget & Appropriations Committee6d agoApril 15, 2026
Dozens of seniors and advocates pack City Hall to protest proposed cuts as 'penny wise, pound foolish'
Over 40 public commenters — seniors, disability advocates, nonprofit leaders and domestic workers — urged supervisors to restore funding, arguing preventive community services cost far less than emergency and institutional care.
Why it matters: Speakers presented data that 98% of community service clients report positive health impacts, that isolated seniors cost Medicare $6.7 billion more annually, and that nearly half of single unhoused adults are over 50 — making cuts to prevention programs a likely cost-shift to hospitals and shelters.
San Francisco
Booker T. WashingtonBudget & Appropriations Committee6d agoApril 15, 2026
Advocates warn cuts would disproportionately hit Black, LGBTQ and immigrant seniors
Representatives from Booker T. Washington, Stepping Stone Health, and immigrant worker organizations argued the proposed cuts would fall hardest on communities already facing systemic disparities.
Why it matters: DAS data shows its clients are disproportionately BIPOC, and the Dignity Fund needs assessment found LGBTQ participation rates are half the eligible population — making cuts to targeted programs an equity concern.
DAS proposes $2.9M in cuts targeting community centers, LGBTQ programs, digital navigators and workforce
The Department of Disability and Aging Services proposed $2.9 million in reductions affecting community center extensions, neighborhood programs, LGBTQ pilots, digital navigators, workforce programs and safety initiatives.
Why it matters: These are the second consecutive year of significant cuts to DAS discretionary funding, potentially impacting 2,400 program enrollments at a time when the senior population is the city's fastest growing demographic.
MOHCD proposes eliminating 69 community grants and digital equity programs, hitting 7,900 residents
The Mayor's Office of Housing proposes cutting $8.5 million by eliminating its entire community-based services portfolio of 69 grants, digital equity programs, and facility capital improvements.
Why it matters: Forty-six percent of the nearly 7,900 residents served by these grants are seniors, and the fiber-to-housing program provides free internet to nearly 8,000 senior households across 211 affordable housing sites citywide.
City faces $690M deficit, not $1B as often cited, budget director admits
The mayor's budget director confirmed the two-year deficit has shrunk to roughly $690 million from the earlier $1 billion projection, though $400 million in ongoing cuts are still sought.
Why it matters: The revised deficit number undermines the rationale for the severity of proposed cuts to senior services; Supervisor Walton publicly challenged the administration's framing, creating political space for restoration efforts.
Youth Commission Warns Hiring Freeze Could Leave It With Only Two Staff, Crippling Capacity
After the director's resignation left two staff covering three roles, commissioners urge the Board to support the Clerk's office budget proposal maintaining a full three-person Youth Commission team.
Why it matters: During a 2021-22 staffing shortage that dropped to just one staffer, the commission's ability to represent youth needs was severely impaired—a scenario that could recur under the mayor's hiring freeze.
San Francisco
City CharterBudget & Appropriations Committee27d agoMarch 25, 2026
Youth Commission Fights to Stay in City Charter After Streamlining Task Force Recommends Removal
The commission opposes a task force recommendation to move the Youth Commission from the city charter to the administrative code, arguing charter status protects independence.
Why it matters: Removing charter status would let the Board or Mayor restructure or eliminate the commission without voter approval, fundamentally changing youth representation in city governance.
Commission Thanks Board for Free Muni, Seeks Transit Safety Cameras and Youth Ridership Data
Youth commissioners thank the Board for protecting free Muni and recommend investing in lighting, cameras, and emergency stations at high-traffic stops while piloting youth transit safety audits.
Why it matters: There is currently no systematic data on youth transit safety or ridership, leaving resource allocation decisions uninformed by the experience of the city's youngest riders.
San Francisco
Published Reports
Track this commission to get the latest reports in your inbox
