Council Confirms Interim Administrator, Places Foreclosure Tax on Ballot

Oakland's City Council navigated a packed, out-of-order agenda Tuesday night that touched every pressure point in city governance — from a contested leadership appointment needed to protect $200 million in bond financing, to an emotional reckoning over whether the city has anywhere to send people displaced by encampment closures. The council also placed a new foreclosure tax on the November ballot, heard dire warnings from AC Transit, and strengthened sanctuary city protections.

• Elizabeth Lake confirmed as interim City Administrator in a 6-2 vote to ensure signing authority for $200M in short-term bond financing
• Foreclosure transfer tax loophole closure headed to November 2026 ballot, estimated to raise $4–13M annually from banks and private equity
• AC Transit warns of $200M, four-year deficit with potential 16% service cuts and 300 job losses without a regional ballot measure
• 34 speakers weigh in on General Plan update, with Port-aligned industrial interests clashing with housing and environmental advocates over Oakland's long-term land use
• Six-month pilot street closures approved near International Blvd. to combat sex trafficking using environmental design
• City of Refuge sanctuary ordinance advances with amendments recognizing historic harms to Black residents
• Only 5 of 46 city properties deemed feasible for shelter or safe parking as encampment policy launches with a $1.2M budget gap

---

Interim Administrator Confirmed Amid Trust Deficit and Ticking Clock

The council confirmed Elizabeth Lake as interim City Administrator on a 6-2 vote — a move Mayor Barbara Lee framed as essential to protect hundreds of millions of dollars in imminent financing.

Why it matters: The city's former administrator is on leave through July 15, and Oakland's charter requires a confirmed administrator to execute financial documents. Without one, the city risked losing $750,000 in CalPERS prepayment savings and delaying the closing of up to $200 million in tax and revenue anticipation notes (TRANs) — short-term borrowing the city uses to manage cash flow.

Where things stand: Mayor Lee presented the appointment as an operational necessity driven by the financing calendar. But the debate quickly surfaced deeper fissures. Councilmember Ken Houston (District 7) questioned why the city was scrambling at the last minute. "This city should be ran like a business. These dates didn't just pop up. We knew about these dates," he said.

The other side: Councilmember Janani Ramachandran (District 4) cast the sharpest dissent, rooting her opposition in past financial decisions. "I do not support this because I do not trust Ms. Lake to sell bonds or execute financing notes or any other critical financial decision for the City of Oakland," she said, citing concerns about land deals and sports deals. Council President Kevin Jenkins (District 6) also voted no.

Public commenter Gene Hazard challenged the legal basis of the appointment, arguing the city charter does not define an "interim" administrator role.

Decisions: The motion passed 6-2 (For: Brown, Fife, Gallo, Houston, Unger, Wang; Against: Ramachandran, Jenkins; Absent: 0).

The related $200M TRANs resolution — the financing that drove the urgency — passed unanimously 8-0 in a separate vote. Finance Director Bradley Johnson and Treasury Manager David Jones confirmed the notes received the highest short-term credit ratings from S&P and Moody's and include a CalPERS prepayment that saves the city $750,000.

---

Foreclosure Tax Headed to November Ballot

Closing the Loophole

The council voted 7-0 to place a measure on the November 2026 ballot that would close a Measure X exemption allowing foreclosure transactions to avoid Oakland's real property transfer tax. The measure specifically targets banks, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and private equity firms acquiring distressed properties.

The basics: Oakland's existing real property transfer tax — one of the city's largest revenue sources — currently exempts foreclosure acquisitions. The proposed ballot measure would eliminate that exemption for institutional acquirers while preserving it for individuals experiencing hardship, affordable housing conversions, and community banking organizations.

Why it matters: The revenue is countercyclical, meaning it rises during economic downturns when the city most needs it. Councilmember Charlene Wang (District 2), who authored the measure, presented data showing that in the first half of 2026 alone, closing the loophole could have generated between $5.4 million and $24.6 million.

Where things stand: Councilmember Ramachandran secured a key amendment giving the council authority to amend or remove future exemptions by ordinance — without returning to the ballot. Finance Director Bradley Johnson confirmed the staff estimate of $4–13M annually is reasonable but volatile. The advisory companion measure originally paired with the proposal was removed.

Former Councilmember Dan Kalb spoke in favor, noting the measure could incentivize banks to offer payment plans rather than foreclose on residential homes. Josephine Guzman of the Oakland Chamber of Commerce thanked Councilmember Wang for the stakeholder engagement process. San Francisco is pursuing similar legislation.

Decisions: Passed 7-0 (Jenkins excused). Final passage will place the measure before voters in November 2026.

---

AC Transit Sounds the Alarm on $200M Deficit

AC Transit Board Director Sarah Syed and agency staff delivered a stark financial outlook to the council: a $200 million deficit over four years, driven by a 28% spike in fuel costs, 14% bus parts inflation, and 35% higher bus prices.

Why it matters: AC Transit serves 40 million rides annually — 140,000 daily boarders — and 65% of its riders are transit-dependent with no alternative. Three-quarters are people of color earning below $50,000 annually. Without a regional ballot measure in November 2026, the agency will implement a contingency service plan cutting 16% of bus service and eliminating up to 300 jobs. A state bridge loan provides current-year relief but does not close the structural gap.

The other side: Councilmember Houston used the presentation to criticize AC Transit over the Bus Rapid Transit project on International Boulevard, a sore point in his district. Councilmember Wang asked how the council could help pass the ballot measure.

What's next: The November 2026 regional ballot measure is the linchpin. If it fails, service cuts could take effect by June 2027.

---

34 Speakers Weigh In on Oakland's Land Use Future

Port Jobs vs. Housing Density

A study session on the General Plan Phase 2 Draft Land Use Framework — the document that will shape Oakland's zoning, housing density, and industrial footprint for decades — drew 34 public speakers and extensive council discussion. No action was taken.

Why it matters: The framework must reconcile competing imperatives: the Port of Oakland supports roughly 100,000 regional jobs, while the state is pressing cities to zone for more housing. The choices Oakland makes now will determine what gets built — and where — for a generation.

Where things stand: Planning Director Bill Gilchrist and Strategic Planning Manager Laura Kaminsky presented the draft framework, emphasizing it remains a work in progress with over 800 comments received and engagement continuing through summer. Staff stressed this is a listening session with draft elements expected in fall 2026.

Port-aligned industrial stakeholders mounted a coordinated push to preserve industrial land. A representative from Prologis warned against reducing industrial acreage before completing a comprehensive needs analysis. Aaron Wright of ILWU Local 10, a third-generation longshoreman, urged protection of industrial land and requested adoption of overweight corridor legislation for heavyweight truck routes. The Oakland Chamber of Commerce echoed those concerns.

On the other side, Brooke Tran of the Urban Strategies Council presented youth engagement findings emphasizing affordable housing, native plants, park maintenance, and concern about data center rezoning in East and West Oakland. Environmental advocates called for native plant requirements, and library commissioners asked for library facilities to be included in the framework.

Councilmember Carroll Fife (District 3) delivered a pointed statement balancing both sides. "I don't think I can stress enough — I know that we all want to preserve Oakland's position as the fifth largest port city in the state of California," she said, while also noting the need to balance environmental and residential concerns.

Councilmember Wang highlighted cultural district formalization and flagged that Little Saigon was missing from the draft maps. Councilmember Houston asked about grandfathering protections for historic businesses.

What's next: Staff will continue engagement through summer, with draft land use elements expected in fall 2026.

---

Street Closures Approved to Combat Trafficking Near Elementary School

A Pilot With Skeptics on Both Sides

The council approved a six-month pilot temporarily closing 9th, 10th, and 11th Avenues between International Boulevard and 15th Street to disrupt street-level sex trafficking near Franklin Elementary School and a Head Start center.

Why it matters: The proposal, brought by Councilmember Wang, uses a crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) approach modeled on Houston, Texas, where similar closures dramatically reduced trafficking activity. The pilot is funded from Councilmember Wang's discretionary transportation funds.

Where things stand: Councilmember Wang acknowledged the measure has limits. "Even I was skeptical about this proposal," she said, describing it as one piece of a multi-pronged strategy that includes enforcement and exit services.

Supporters from the East Bay Asian Youth Center and the San Antonio Neighborhood Coalition emphasized the pilot offers tangible relief. David Kakashiba of the East Bay Asian Youth Center noted that the East 15th Street closure had brought transformative results and said the pilot is worth trying.

The other side: Business owner Brenda Grisham opposed the closures, arguing they would push trafficking activity to her block and that affected women need resources, not just barriers. A legal aid attorney from Little Saigon also raised concerns about disruption to residents.

Council President Jenkins abstained, citing the cumulative toll on International Boulevard. "I'm very hesitant to do anything on International Boulevard that would further disrupt the businesses, the people, the residents on International Boulevard," he said.

Decisions: Passed 6-0-1-1 (For: Brown, Fife, Gallo, Houston, Unger, Wang; Abstain: Jenkins; Absent: Ramachandran).

---

City of Refuge Ordinance Advances With Historic Amendments

The council approved Councilmember Wang's City of Refuge ordinance on introduction — the first of two required votes — codifying Oakland's sanctuary city protections into permanent law. The measure passed 8-0 with significant amendments.

Why it matters: The ordinance consolidates existing sanctuary protections and prohibits city employees from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement — a move driven by escalating ICE operations in the Bay Area. James Wood, a Faith in Action East Bay leader and 50-year Oakland attorney, told the council the ordinance was crafted after 10 ICE detentions occurred in five days.

Where things stand: Councilmember Houston introduced extensive "whereas" clauses recognizing historic and ongoing harms to Black communities — from slavery and redlining to urban renewal, the war on drugs, and displacement. "40 years. My people been waiting for this," Houston said. Councilmember Wang added amendments strengthening prohibitions on city employee cooperation with immigration enforcement and requiring a review of city forms to remove unnecessary immigration status questions.

Members of Faith in Action East Bay, the Unity Council, and the Spanish Speaking Citizens Foundation spoke in support. Public commenter Assata Olabala challenged why other Alameda County cities have not adopted similar protections.

What's next: Final passage is scheduled for July 21.

---

Five Sites, Massive Gap: Encampment Policy Launches Without Alternatives

Fife Demands Honesty

Staff presented the results of a comprehensive review of 46 city-owned properties for shelter, safe parking, and vehicle storage uses. The findings were sobering: five Tier 1 sites emerged across Districts 5, 6, and 7; nine showed potential with constraints; and 32 were infeasible.

Why it matters: Oakland's Encampment Abatement Policy launches July 14. With no safe parking sites yet operational, unhoused residents face displacement without alternatives. The $1.2M budgeted is enough for only 8–9 months at a single site.

Where things stand: Councilmember Houston pushed aggressively for immediate action on the 711 71st Avenue site, which was previously funded with $500,000 but saw its infrastructure destroyed. "So we're behind the ball because in seven days when it's launched, we don't have a property ready that could have been ready three months ago," he said.

Councilmember Fife delivered an emotional challenge to her colleagues, demanding the council be honest about the gap between policy and capacity. "I refuse to give folks false hope that somehow what we're doing is addressing this macroeconomic problem and we haven't identified it," she said, calling for District 3 to be prioritized.

Councilmember Wang noted the $1.2M budget falls far short of what is needed. Staff confirmed that sensitivity mapping and 14 updated standard operating procedures are complete, but low-sensitivity zones — areas where people can relocate — have not been finalized.

What's next: The Encampment Abatement Policy launches July 14 with significant implementation gaps unresolved.

---

Minor Items

• $14.67M in federal HUD grants approved for FY 2026–27, allocating CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds to housing rehabilitation, anti-displacement, and homelessness programs.
• Consent calendar approved including a Costco exclusive negotiation agreement, planning code amendments, Oakland Fund for Children and Youth (OFCY) grants, and multiple board and commission appointments.