State Law Ties Saratoga's Hands on Oak Place Builder's Remedy Project

Saratoga's City Council on Sept. 16, 2026, unanimously approved a four-unit subdivision on Oak Place that nearly every speaker opposed and that every councilmember said the city could not legally stop. On the same night, the council struck a sidewalk requirement from a historic 6th Street home and got its first public look at a 10-year plan, priced at roughly $9.7M in its first year, to move policing to Los Gatos.

---

• Oak Place builder's remedy project upheld 5-0, although 13 of 14 speakers asked for changes
• Los Gatos police partnership pegged at about $9.7M, versus about $11.4M to stay with the sheriff; no vote yet
• Residents split on the police switch, with many urging the council to slow down before October
• Council strikes sidewalk condition on a historic 6th Street home, overriding staff's recommendation

---

Oak Place: 'No Legal Basis' to Say No

The basics: The builder's remedy, part of the state Housing Accountability Act, limits a city's ability to deny projects for general plan or zoning inconsistency when the city lacks a certified housing element. The preliminary application for 14486 Oak Place was filed March 19, 2024, before Saratoga had one.

Why it matters: The hearing showed how little control Saratoga keeps over qualifying housing projects, even when neighbors and the full council object.

Where things stand: The project splits a 6,750-square-foot lot into three lots, with three 3-story homes and one ADU, about 42 feet tall. City planner Kyle acknowledged there were "quite a few general plan and zoning standards the project would not normally meet." Asked whether the city had any legal basis to deny the project, City Attorney Richard answered, "as a city, no." He said conditions could not shrink the project: "But we can't say the project must be X feet lower or the project has to have a wider setback because those would render the project infeasible."

The other side: Appellant Ram Jagadeesan and his attorney, Mr. Durkee, argued that the AB 130 environmental exemption fails and that objective standards should apply. "This project is clearly feasible at 2 stories," said Durkee.

The habitat fight pitted biologist against biologist. "It's naive to rule out the possibility of white-tailed kite or any raptor or bat occurring in that area," said Sandra Etchell, the appellants' wildlife biologist. "Saying there could be something there is speculation, which CEQA doesn't permit," replied Dr. Rick Hopkins of Live Oak Associates.

On fire safety, Acting Fire Marshal Brad Fox of Santa Clara County Fire said the project meets water and access requirements. Neighbor Sangeeta argued the ADU counts toward housing totals but not toward fire safety. Other neighbors raised privacy concerns, rooftop decks and the area's Craftsman-era character. Austin was the only commenter who urged approval.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: Vice Mayor Tina Walia asked applicant Deepak Chandani, "Would you like to consider making any changes to this project?" He declined: "So I don't think we can change that."

Mayor Chuck Page floated approving the project without the rooftop patios. The city attorney warned, "I think that could leave the city vulnerable to a challenge by the applicant." Councilmember Belal Aftab agreed with that caution: "I worry about the legal precedents that have already been set and introducing a significant legal risk for the city and also the potential decertification of our housing element."

"The state law has tied my hands," said Walia. Aftab's motion to deny the appeal passed by voice vote (For: 5, Against: 0, Absent: 0). The applicant keeps his 2024 entitlement. Neighbors get no design changes. The city avoids litigation and risk to its housing element.

What's next: The appellants argue a court challenge to the CEQA exemption could unwind the approval and the project's vested 2024 date.

---

Police Switch: The Deal on the Table

Why it matters: Aftab warned that under the sheriff contract, "we would burn through our reserves, or basically our savings, in about 3 to 4 years."

Where things stand: In August, Saratoga signed a five-year sheriff contract that either side can end with one year's notice. According to the staff report, "The estimated cost for fiscal year '26-'27 is approximately $10.9 million compared to $9 million last year." That cost is projected to reach about $11.4M next year.

The Los Gatos-Monte Sereno Police Department proposal has these terms:
- Base cost: $9.5M, plus roughly $300,000 to $337,000 a year in startup recovery
- Staffing: 16.5 new positions, including 7 sworn officers
- Term and start: 10 years, beginning Oct. 1, 2027
- Cost caps: 3% to 8% for base costs and 4% for external mandates
- Oversight: an advisory committee of two elected officials per jurisdiction

"So at the worst-case scenario, 12% would be your base and external mandate cost," said Los Gatos Town Manager Chris Constantine.

Saratoga would still owe about $150,000 a year on the West Valley substation lease through November 2029. The staff report also cautioned that "the proposed agreement does not establish dedicated Saratoga staffing levels, fixed Saratoga patrol hours, or guaranteed response times."

The other side: Councilmember Yan Zhao pressed on staffing: "How do you determine that 14 staff will be needed based on the workload, the phone calls, or the past history of Saratoga, or based on population?" Chief Fields said Los Gatos commissioned a transition study from Meliora Public Safety Consulting. He added, "yes, we would need to hire more staff in order to do this, and there is a 1-year implementation plan behind that."

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: No action was taken. Page asked for a plan on the department's name and for the removal of raise surcharges: "We ought to be paying exactly what the cost is, no extra surcharge on raises." About $1.7M in projected annual savings must be weighed against transition risk for residents and the sheriff relationship.

What's next: Town halls are scheduled for Sept. 19 and Sept. 30. Staff will return in October.

---

Residents Split on Pace and Oversight

Why it matters: The council is weighing a decade-long commitment with a November election ahead, and many speakers questioned the timing.

Where things stand: Supporters included Monte Sereno Mayor Rowena Turner, who cited disaster preparedness, house checks and transparency. Jonathan Knowles, president of the Los Gatos-Monte Sereno Police Foundation, called the partnership a chance for Saratoga to have a voice in public safety. Former resident Patrick Moakler pointed to roughly 20% county price increases. Los Gatos Councilmember Matthew Hudes cited mutual emergency response and said Saratoga would decide whether to use Flock license-plate cameras.

The other side: Municipal attorney Cara Silver flagged red flags: Flock as the impetus for the contract, unpredictable police costs and no assurance the county would take Saratoga back. Public commenter Marianne cited 70 years of sheriff service. Austin criticized the contract's reliance on one year of data and an advisory committee that excludes the public. KB said Los Gatos admitted hidden costs and hiring problems.

Josh questioned rushing a 10-year deal given the existing five-year sheriff contract and the November elections. Tim McKenzie and Andrew Siegler urged the council to slow down. Glenn Hendricks asked about liability, chief hiring, union negotiations and what is driving the October timeline.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: Councilmember Kookie Fitzsimmons said 13 meetings on the topic is enough. Aftab called it a legitimate budget problem and invited feedback on the contract. Zhao said she needs clearer answers: "I need to get a better answer on that so that I can talk about it."

---

Sidewalk Condition Dropped on 6th Street

Why it matters: The decision limits the use of variance conditions to impose commercial-style frontage requirements on isolated residential lots.

Where things stand: The Planning Commission approved a 2,293-square-foot home with an ADU at 14650 6th Street. The approval included a front-setback variance of about 1.5 feet, where 15 feet is required. The commission added Condition 13, requiring a sidewalk, so the variance would not be a special privilege. Staff recommended keeping that condition but said "either way, the project could be supported for approval."

Appellant Ismar argued that "forcing a modern concrete walkway would require dismantling the classic white picket fence and stripping the historic front yard setting" of the 1895 Queen Anne home. Public commenter Josh questioned adding a random 40-foot sidewalk segment. Sarah noted a sidewalk already exists across the street.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: "Adding that 5-foot setback within the fenced area serves no purpose, or removing the fence takes away from the character of the home," said Walia. "I just don't think it's right to exact a pound of flesh just because the variance word is in here," said Page.

Walia's motion, seconded by Aftab, granted the appeal and removed Condition 13 and its related finding. It passed unanimously by voice vote. One councilmember announced a recusal at the start of the item.

---

Minor Items

• Commissioners appointed: Library, Public Arts and Parks and Recreation commissioners appointed unanimously (For: 5, Against: 0).
• Consent calendar: Items 1.1 through 1.5 approved 5-0 without discussion.
• Childhood Cancer Awareness Month: September proclaimed, honoring Jacob's Heart. "These families should never have to face it alone," said Laura Bartels, board treasurer.
• Temporary sculptures: The council allowed temporary sculptures to proceed as long as they stay under budget.
• Housing bills: Page reported that regional leaders sent a letter to the Assembly Speaker urging a pause on new housing bills.

---

Looking Ahead

The Saratoga Chamber of Commerce marks its 100th anniversary Oct. 10 at the Odd Fellows Lodge. Policing town halls are set for Sept. 19 and Sept. 30, ahead of the council's October return to the Los Gatos proposal.