Santa Cruz Council Doubles Parking Permit Fee in Sweeping Street Package

Santa Cruz residents with permit parking will pay twice as much starting July 1, 2027. On Oct. 27, 2026, the City Council voted 7-0 to raise residential permits from $30 to $60, shift permits to a per-parcel basis and push the city's Vision Zero goal of zero traffic deaths to 2050. In a marathon meeting, the council also approved a $232M rebuild of the city's main drinking water plant, toughened downtown vacancy rules and signaled it would stop subsidizing housing incentives from the general fund.

• Residential permit parking doubles to $60 as the program moves to per-parcel limits; passed 7-0
• Vision Zero target shifts to 2050, drawing criticism over notice and accountability
• $232M Graham Hill Water Treatment Plant rebuild approved 7-0, setting up next month's rate fight
• Lot consolidation fee deferred, not waived, after the mayor objected to general fund subsidies
• Vacant storefront registry fee rises to $4,000 under Vibrancy Ordinance changes; passed 6-0
• Council directs staff to seek alternatives to state density bonus law and to protect commercial space

---

Parking Permits Double as Program Chases Cost Recovery

The basics: Residential permit parking reserves neighborhood curb space for residents with permits. Staff traced the overhaul to August 2025 council direction after state housing laws reduced required parking, to Murray Street Bridge construction impacts on Lower Seabright businesses and to May 12 direction on objective standards.

Why it matters: The program covers only about half its costs, and the general fund absorbs a $300,000 gap. As infill housing expands permit zones, the city wants permits to pay for themselves.

"We have about a 52% cost recovery in this program," said Claire Gallogly, Principal Transportation Planner.

Where things stand: The package does several things:
- Issues permits per parcel instead of per address
- Sets clearer thresholds and a clearer process for creating permit areas
- Lets staff change meter rates or hours, or suspend collection, under authority modeled on Sacramento
- Creates a mechanism for adopting plan lines for the downtown plan expansion, though none have been adopted yet and staff expect them late this year
- Strengthens development standards by referencing the city's active transportation plan, safety action plan and federal pedestrian access guidelines, known as PROWAG
- Raises the fee to $60 per car per year, effective in fiscal 2028

Councilmember Susie O'Hara framed the standards as non-negotiable: "If you're not going to provide adequate parking, that is a health and safety violation of our muni code."

Councilmember Renee Golder raised concerns about lot size and lot splits. Staff said lot splits remain a trickle. Vice Mayor Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson pressed staff on a stalled transportation impact fee study: "We didn't get the grant that we were hoping to get." The study will now be self-funded starting in 2027.

The other side: Public commenter Eric Rodberg supported permit parking. He opposed 24/7 permit-only streets, said staff ignores a 75% occupancy rule and called the one-year price jump too steep. Rafa Sonnenfeld, a board member of the Shelter Lagoon Homeowners Association, asked how per-parcel permits and voting would work for his 95-unit condo complex. He argued that people should vote, not land. Staff said each parcel gets one vote, cast through an HOA administrative process. Bruce Thomas said enforcement after 6 p.m. falls short and urged a "parking impact" fee on developers who use parking waivers. Matt Miller of Ecology Action backed the updates and urged the city to share its practices with neighboring jurisdictions.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: Councilmember Sonja Brunner asked about notice and a tiered rate. Staff said a mailer will explain the change. A tiered rate is not proposed, but the council could direct staff to develop one. The motion by Vice Mayor Kalantari-Johnson, seconded by Councilmember Golder, passed (For: 7, Against: 0, Absent: 0). Permit holders pay more. Condo residents share a per-parcel allotment. Developers face firmer street-safety obligations.

---

Vision Zero Goal Slides to 2050

Where things stand: As part of the same 7-0 vote, the council replaced 2019 Vision Zero language that staff called outdated. The new resolution sets interim goals for 2030 and 2040 and an ultimate goal of zero traffic deaths by 2050. Staff said it aligns with the safety action plan adopted at the prior meeting and keeps five projects worth more than $50M moving.

The other side: One public commenter said the change was buried in a PDF without explicit notice. He cited 16 deaths and 94 serious injuries from 2020 to 2024 and said the later target tolerates roughly 32 more deaths and 186 serious injuries. He demanded an independent evaluation and credited the City Attorney with prompting a separate resolution. Public commenter Garrett called zero unrealistic and said he feared lower speed limits. He acknowledged that local bike and pedestrian injury data is worse than state averages.

---

Graham Hill Plant Rebuild Sets Up Rate Fight

Why it matters: This is the Water Department's largest project ever. It rebuilds the city's primary drinking water plant to withstand climate and regulatory risks. Staff said the project can move forward only if the council approves the proposed rate increases.

"The total project cost is $232 million," said Heidi Luckenbach, Water Director.

Where things stand: The project began as a 1997 study. It became possible after voters passed Measure W in 2020, which authorized progressive design-build contracting. Construction runs from January 2027 through 2031.

The budget includes $150M for construction and $81M for other costs. Funding comes from four sources:
- A $113M federal WIFIA loan
- A $50M drinking water state revolving fund loan
- A $25M grant
- Pay-go and bonds

The council approved the plans, a Phase 2 progressive design-build agreement with AECOM Lyles, construction management and an owner-controlled insurance program. Goals include advanced treatment, readiness for new regulations and treating more impaired water to support aquifer storage and recovery.

Councilmember O'Hara asked about "the nexus of a quarter-billion-dollar project and our current rate case." She also asked about river treatment and outreach to neighbors, which kicks off in November. Staff said the financial pro forma covers the project if the requested rate increases pass.

The other side: Under Prop 218, California's rule requiring property-related fees to be proportional, one commenter argued that ratepayers in the first five-year cycle pay 3.8 times more than in later cycles under pay-go. He submitted a protest. Garrett asked whether the 18.5-million-gallon-per-day design is enough for 50 years, given existing capacity of 24 million gallons per day. He also demanded disclosure of fund balances.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: The motion by Councilmember O'Hara, seconded by Councilmember Brunner, passed (For: 7, Against: 0, Absent: 0).

What's next: A water rate public hearing is expected next month.

---

Mayor Draws Line on Housing Subsidies

Where things stand: Item 13 bundled several housing and zoning cleanups:
- Waives the roughly $2,000 lot consolidation fee when at least two lots are combined to create at least two units, under housing element objective 1.1E
- Removes the 20,000-square-foot minimum for planned development permits
- Updates rules for supportive, transitional and agricultural employee housing as state law requires
- Clarifies inclusionary housing language without changing policy
- Aligns the general plan with the city's climate action and adaptation plans

About 11 people attended a community meeting, with no opposition. The Planning Commission recommended approval Oct. 1.

The other side: Mayor Fred Keeley objected on principle. "I do not see the argument for general fund subsidies or other taxpayers subsidizing other people's lot consolidation," he said, calling himself "a jealous guardian of the general fund."

Lee Butler, Community Development Director, said state law requires the city to offer an incentive, and the waiver was "a fairly benign one." He said a partial reduction or deferral were possible. Staff had also considered setback flexibility, non-appealability and condo conversion exemptions.

Sonnenfeld, speaking for a group transcribed as Santa Cruz EMB, supported the item but urged bolder incentives. He noted that redevelopment could raise property tax revenue.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: Councilmember O'Hara moved to defer the fee until the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection. Her motion also directs staff to present multiple options on future housing element items. Vice Mayor Kalantari-Johnson seconded, and the amended motion passed with seven ayes recorded. The change meets the housing element obligation without a general fund subsidy.

What's next: Second reading is set for Nov. 17.

---

Downtown Vacancy Rules Get Teeth

Why it matters: "We've had 20 new businesses open, which is huge," said Rebecca Unitt, Economic Development Manager, describing results since the Vibrancy Ordinance took effect.

Where things stand: Staff reported nine Pacific Avenue vacancies, 13 businesses in the pipeline, 19 spaces monitored and eight code enforcement cases. Seven window coverings have been installed, costing $34,503 of a $50,000 budget.

The amendments make these changes:
- Expand the registry to the downtown plan area
- Apply maintenance and window-covering standards citywide starting Jan. 1, 2027
- Apply rules storefront by storefront
- Shorten the 180-day window-covering deadline
- Limit the Downtown Pops exemption to Pacific Avenue
- Raise the registry fee to $4,000 plus CPI, since staff say actual workload is about $5,400 per storefront
- Remove building permit fees, worth up to $14,000 each, for 20 more projects
- Create a $76,000 window-covering grant program offering up to $2,000 per property from the Economic Development Trust Fund

The other side: Mayor Keeley suggested flexible partial fee reductions. Butler cautioned: "When you are waiving or reducing fees, that is a gift of public funds that would trigger prevailing wage." Council members also asked about anchor retail, River Row, use permits and Mission Street.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: The first reading passed (For: 6, Against: 0, Absent: 0). Councilmember Brunner was disqualified because of her employment. Owners of long-vacant storefronts face higher costs. New tenants gain fee relief.

---

Council Seeks Alternatives to State Density Bonus

Where things stand: Staff updated the council on multifamily design guidelines. The work began with council direction in March and included a roundtable with design professionals, a walking tour, a July community meeting and a survey with 753 responses. Respondents' top priorities were gradual transitions between neighborhoods and how buildings meet the sidewalk.

Mayor Keeley held up a poster of the Calypso project as an example of 100% affordable housing with strong design. Butler noted that guidelines cannot be required. The mayor said he would no longer accept developers' claims that such design features can't be achieved: "I'm not going to take that as an answer anymore."

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: Councilmember O'Hara's motion directs staff to take three steps:
- Review the inclusionary ordinance and alternatives to relying on state density bonus law, with a consultant onboarding in 2026
- Develop strategies to preserve commercial space by spring 2027
- Complete the design guidelines

Councilmember Gabriela Trigueiro added a friendly amendment to consider area plans. Councilmember Brunner urged caution, noting the community's diversity. The motion passed (For: 7, Against: 0, Absent: 0).

What's next: Focus groups run from November to December 2026. An Architectural Review Committee meeting follows in early 2027, then the Planning Commission and the council.

---

• Consent items 4-8 and consent public hearing items 9-11 each passed 7-0.
• City Attorney reported closed-session discussion of liability claims and City of Santa Cruz v. University of California.
• Rodberg welcomed the new payment portal's elimination of the $0.45 ACH fee but called its separate logins a downgrade.
• A commenter urged continued emergency weather shelter support despite rising costs.

---

Looking ahead: Mayor Keeley said he has about 1.5 meetings left. The water rate hearing expected next month will test how the $232M Graham Hill rebuild lands on ratepayers.