San Ramon Council Orders Cost Estimates for Senior Park Shade, Seating

Seniors who gather daily at three San Ramon parks have spent a year asking for shade and benches with back support. On Oct. 27, 2026, the City Council voted 5-0 to have staff put prices on those requests, but it approved no money and split sharply over whether the item should have reached the dais at all.

---

• Council votes 5-0 for cost estimates on shade and back-support seating at Valley View, Mosaic and Arlington parks. No funding was approved.
• Process fight splits the council. Mayor Mark Armstrong, Councilmembers Richard Adler and Robert Jweinat want a citywide review. Vice Mayor Marisol Rubio and Councilmember Sridhar Verose say seniors have waited long enough.
• Seniors detail crowded, exposed parks. One resident said about 150 seniors visit Mosaic Park, where seating holds 28.
• Consent calendar passes unanimously, ending a 33-year-old Faustoria overpass agreement despite a resident's bid to pull it.
• City Attorney evaluation continued to the next closed session, expected Nov. 10, after a public call to withhold a contract offer.

---

Seniors Press for Shade, Seating at Three Parks

Why it matters: Senior groups say rain and afternoon sun make their parks hard to use. Even if the council funds improvements, staff estimates installation would take six to eight months after approval.

Where things stand: Public Services Division Manager John Bell walked the council through what exists now:

• Arlington Park has no shade structure. Building at the site identified in the Prop 68-era plan would affect 10 mature trees.
• Mosaic Park has one pergola-style structure and seven benches with back support.
• Valley View Park has three connected 15-by-15-foot shade structures.

Seven written comments came in, and a group of seniors spoke in person. Radhe Shyam Joshi, a member of the Arlington Park Seniors Club, said about 20 people meet there daily, some over 90. They need shade that protects them from both sun and rain.

Mahendra Pakkar, a Mosaic Park resident since 2013, said about 150 seniors visit the park but its seating holds only 28. He asked for covered seating and early consideration.

Other speakers made related requests:

• Radha, speaking for Mosaic Park seniors, asked for more benches and back-supporting seating, possibly flexible or removable.
• Dilip added drinking water and brighter entrance lighting for safety after sunset.
• Bala said the seniors group at the sports park has outgrown its existing seating.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: The motion by Rubio, seconded by Verose, passed (For: 5, Against: 0, Absent: 0). It directs staff to return with cost estimates for four things:

• Removable back supports with storage, or retrofitted benches.
• Replacing or retrofitting the Mosaic structure.
• A new Arlington structure that avoids removing trees.
• Expanded shade at Valley View.

The City Manager explained why the vote was needed: "I do need three council members in a public meeting to provide direction to staff."

Park improvements normally move through the annual budget. Unbudgeted work would likely draw on the general fund reserve, the mid-year budget review or the January budget workshop. Seniors at the three parks now have a formal path forward. Any spending, however, will compete with other reserve priorities and needs a separate council vote.

What's next: Staff will bring cost estimates back to the council. Funding decisions would follow through reserves, mid-year review or the January workshop.

---

Process Fight Exposes a Council Divide

Why it matters: The vote was unanimous, but the debate was not. The split shows tension over how individual members put constituent requests on the agenda instead of routing them through staff and the Parks and Community Services Commission.

Where things stand: Mayor Mark Armstrong said the item broke from normal process. He argued the council should consult the parks master plan and the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the city's multiyear list of infrastructure projects.

"We have to look at this holistically and take a look at all our parks across the city," said Mayor Armstrong.

Councilmember Robert Jweinat (District 1) said he first heard of the request that night. "This should have gone right in front of Parks and Rec," said Councilmember Jweinat.

Councilmember Richard Adler (District 2) agreed. "I'm concerned that we're kind of doing this piecemeal," said Councilmember Adler, who asked staff to rank park needs citywide.

Public commenter Greg Carr made a similar case. He urged a staff-led citywide assessment and priority list rather than hiring consultants, and he favored solid covers over slatted shade.

The other side: Councilmember Sridhar Verose (District 3) is the only council member who previously served on the Parks and Community Services Commission. He urged colleagues to act on constituent requests rather than defer to commissions. "We should perform with a bias for action," said Councilmember Verose.

Vice Mayor Marisol Rubio said emails and calls on the issue had gone unanswered for a year. She called Jweinat's characterization of her motives offensive and narrowed the request to options only. "All we're asking for today is to look into options for the back support seating and the shade in those 3 parks that were asked for a year ago," said Vice Mayor Rubio.

Armstrong urged members to stay on topic and pressed for specifics staff could act on.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: The narrowed motion passed 5-0. Separately, Armstrong won informal direction for a citywide review of park shade and seating needs. Three members signaled agreement by nodding, so it was not a formal vote.

Seniors at the three parks keep their place in line. Residents near other parks could benefit if the citywide review takes hold.

What's next: Watch whether the citywide review returns as a formal item and how it lines up with the three-park estimates.

---

One Resident's Challenge Spans the Night

Why it matters: A public commenter identifying as American Intelligence spoke at nearly every stage of the meeting. The commenter argued that residents are being denied the ability to pull consent items for separate discussion. That dispute now shadows the council's review of its top legal adviser.

Where things stand: During public comment, the commenter asked to pull consent item 5.5. The commenter objected to having three minutes to cover both agenda and non-agenda topics, and criticized the resolution's description of the land transfer and its police and fire coverage. "That document does not properly disclose our interest," the commenter said.

Mayor Armstrong held off on the request until public comment closed, then explained the item. "It terminates a 33-year-old agreement that was made at the time of the building of the Faustoria overpass," he said.

That agreement required approval from San Ramon and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) for any sale of the parcel. Ending it lets Danville transfer the parcel to the East Bay Regional Park District. Armstrong described the transfer as zero-dollar and said it involves no San Ramon property.

No council member pulled the item. Verose moved and Rubio seconded the full consent calendar, items 5.1 through 5.5, which passed unanimously by voice vote. No numerical tally was announced.

The other side: Before the closed session on the City Attorney's evaluation, the commenter urged the council not to extend a contract offer. "Please withhold your offer and look elsewhere to see if we can find a better fit," the commenter said.

The City Attorney responded: "She's never come forward with any specific section of the Brown Act that's in violation." The Brown Act is California's open-meetings law.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: After the closed session, Armstrong reported the evaluation was continued with nothing further to report. The City Attorney's contract status remains unresolved. The commenter also urged the council to restore monthly Finance Committee meetings.

What's next: The evaluation is expected to return at the next closed session, anticipated Nov. 10.

---

• Aquatics honor: Total Aquatic Management owner Jim Wheeler presented San Ramon's aquatics team with the firm's first Perfect Outstanding Audit Award, following an Aug. 2 audit. Recreation Supervisor Amanda Tugwell accepted for staff.
• Planning Academy: A record 26 residents graduated from the academy, the largest class in its nine years. Senior Planner Ryan Driscoll led the recognition. Graduate Craig Isom called it "a very productive use of my time."
• Leaf blowers: Adler reported the Sustainability Advisory Committee is studying rules for gas-powered leaf blowers, with recommendations expected to return to the council.
• Transit: Rubio reported on County Connection and the Tri-Valley Transportation Council and pushed for shuttle service to Diablo Valley College.
• Storm prep: Jweinat urged residents to stock sandbags and report incidents to the San Ramon Police Department's non-emergency line so the city has better staffing data.

---

Looking ahead: The City Attorney evaluation is expected back in closed session around Nov. 10. Staff's cost estimates for shade and seating at the three parks, and the Sustainability Advisory Committee's leaf blower recommendations, are both due back to the council at future meetings.