SFUSD Board Votes 5-2 to End Elementary Lottery, Backing Option C

San Francisco's school board set a new course for how families get elementary seats on Oct. 13, 2026. It voted 5-2 for Option C, which guarantees every child a neighborhood seat while keeping roughly 40% of seats in citywide programs. The direction came over objections from organized parent groups who cited the district's own surveys favoring a more flexible Option B, and the plan's hardest details are still unwritten.

---

• Option C passes 5-2, ending the lottery model; Fisher and Ray dissent
• Option B pulled without a vote after a procedural objection from the dais
• Forecast error falls from 11% to 1%, but a $35M unrestricted shortfall persists
• Three charter schools draw unanimous support at hearings; decisions come Dec. 1
• NAACP, Tech in Check SF and Hillcrest families press the board on discipline, screens and siting

---

Neighborhood Seats Win, Debate Over Evidence Lingers

The basics: SFUSD now assigns elementary students through a lottery under Board Policy 5101. Board President Phil Kim said the system fails its own goals of predictability and simplicity. Staff offered two replacements:

• Option B: a neighborhood guarantee only for on-time applicants, plus ranked choices and citywide seats
• Option C: a guaranteed neighborhood seat even for late enrollees, with about 40% of seats citywide, including language and K-8 programs

Why it matters: The vote sets the direction for a final policy, which takes effect in the 2028-29 school year. It will shape which school nearly every San Francisco elementary family attends.

Where things stand: Superintendent Hsu recommended C. She argued that B preserves the current system, while C forces investment in under-enrolled Southeast schools. "Option B will keep the status quo," said Superintendent Hsu. She also stressed the vote's limits. "I want to be clear that the board is deciding a direction tonight. It's not a final policy," she said.

Commissioner Matt Alexander, Commissioner Parag Gupta and Board Vice President Jaime Huling embraced C as the long-term vision. "Voting for B is a vote to maintain the lottery, just with more segregation," said Huling. Gupta pointed to district survey findings. "Our survey first and fundamentally said what our parents want, what our community wants, is safety and good schools, a good education," said Gupta.

The other side: Commissioner Supryia Ray and Commissioner Alida Fisher questioned the evidence behind C. "I do not see a strong reason to choose C over B. … I think it is easier to move from B to C than to move from C to B," said Ray.

Fisher tied her doubts to the district's track record. "I struggle to buy in without seeing more of the plan because there have been a lot of broken promises to my family throughout the years," said Fisher. She also asked why the board would adopt a policy starting in two years when fixing schools could take five to 10. Deputy Superintendent John Davis did not dispute the timeline. "There's no doubt it's going to take a while," he said.

Commissioner Lisa Weissman-Ward pressed the superintendent's framing before ultimately voting yes. "Why does C require us to be more brave than B?" she asked.

Public comment split sharply. Speakers from SF Parents and the SF Parents Coalition said 71% of families in the district survey reported B would likely meet their needs, compared with 48% for C. They also cited district projections of 25 high-poverty schools under C, compared with 23 under B. Supervisor Alan Wong urged the board to move toward neighborhood assignment while preserving immersion and specialized programs. Southeast and Latino families, including public commenter Roberto Guzman Rivera, asked the district to strengthen schools first. They also sought guarantees for language pathways, special education and transportation. Public commenter Jenny Garcia requested a public equity analysis by race, income, language, disability and neighborhood before adoption.

A procedural fight: Kim structured the vote so C came first and B would be dropped if C passed, citing a prior memo. "So if you support B, you should vote no on the C resolution in order to get to B," said Kim. One commissioner objected that "doing the vote in the way that's described puts a thumb on the scale for Option C." After C passed, Kim pulled the Option B item (I3), so no vote on B was recorded.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: Option C passed (For: 5, Alexander, Gupta, Huling, Kim, Weissman-Ward; Against: 2, Fisher, Ray; Absent: 0). "We continue to affirm neighborhood schools as the direction of this board," said Kim.

Families in neighborhoods with strong schools gain certainty, including those who enroll late. Parents who value cross-town choice lose ground. Southeast schools are now the test case for whether investment follows the policy. Tiebreakers, boundaries and special education safeguards remain undefined. Hsu pledged that "we will map out programs, both language programs as well as special ed programs."

What's next: Staff will present design principles for program placement, boundaries and tiebreakers on Nov. 10. The policy's first reading is in March, with adoption in April.

---

Sharper Forecasts, Thinner Cushion

Why it matters: The district's budget credibility is improving, but its flexibility is shrinking just as reorganization will demand new investment.

Where things stand: Chief Financial Officer Neeru Jayaraman reported general fund spending of about $1.3B for fiscal year 2025-26, 1% above the adopted budget. "So we can see about a 1% gap in '25-'26 compared to previously an 11% gap," said Budget Office Executive Director Jennifer Schuster. Staff credited Frontline software and documented processes for the improvement. "Going from 11% to 1% variance is pretty incredible," said Gupta, who asked how those practices will survive staff turnover.

Unrestricted operations still ran a $35M deficit after transfers, largely from routine restricted maintenance transfers to Fund 14. "We're down to less than $60 million of wiggle room," said Deputy Superintendent of Business Services Chris Mount Benitez.

Commissioners also asked why certificated salaries came in under budget. Staff cited vacancies, hard-to-fill special education roles and the J-visa program. Mount Benitez cautioned that items added after budget adoption "are more than 80% less likely to ever be acted on." Board members also asked about bringing school leaders into budgeting.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: The board approved the unaudited financial reports and the Gann Limit resolution for SFUSD and the County Office of Education (For: 7, Against: 0, Absent: 0). The Gann Limit is a state constitutional cap on government appropriations. The vote satisfies state reporting rules. However, the thin unrestricted margin constrains any Option C-related spending.

---

Charter Supporters Fill Comment-Only Hearings

The basics: Under Education Code sections 47605 and 47607, the initial renewal hearings were limited to public testimony. Each school received 10 minutes, with one minute per speaker. Staff and charter presentations, along with board discussion, are scheduled for Dec. 1.

Where things stand: Every speaker backed renewal for Thomas Edison Charter Academy, Gateway High School and City Arts and Leadership Academy.

• Thomas Edison: Principal Drew Toomey highlighted dual-language learning, English learner reclassification and arts education. Director of Finance Reina Melendez described a five-year plan with 89% of the budget instructional-facing and unionized teachers.
• Gateway: Co-principal Rebecca Weider traced the school's 1998 founding and its focus on A-G college-prep requirements. Staff and students credited on-site counseling and grief groups.
• City Arts and Leadership: The principal reported zero suspensions this quarter and 11 AP courses. Envision Education Co-chair Kyle Magallanes-Castillo, an alumnus, said the school was a safe haven when he was homeless as a teenager.

Supporters framed City Arts as a small, pro-Black, anti-racist community in Southeast San Francisco. City Arts teacher Joe Steinberger said he is not a general charter proponent but sees exceptional value at City Arts and Thomas Edison. Several speakers were cut off by the time limit.

What's next: "Commissioners will receive the district petition findings and recommendations from staff on or before November 16th," said Kim. The board decides all three renewals on Dec. 1.

---

Organized Voices: Slurs, Screens and Hillcrest

Public comment ran for hours, and many speaker cards went uncalled. Three organized blocs stood out. The board did not respond to any of them during the meeting.

Racial slurs and discipline: Leaders of the NAACP San Francisco branch, along with Reverend Dr. Amos Brown, pressed the district on recurring racial slurs in schools. Cheryl Thornton of the NAACP asked the superintendent what specific actions she would take. The branch's first vice president urged defined, consistent consequences paired with family interventions. Brown thanked leaders for engaging the Black community but urged the board to "stop, look, and listen" before rushing decisions.

Tech limits: Tech in Check SF reported 335 members and a petition with more than 1,100 signatures. The group asked the superintendent to disable YouTube and Gemini AI on school devices and adopt a comprehensive ed-tech policy. Parents criticized the Amira AI tutor, saying it was used without consent. One father described finding inappropriate content in his son's Chromebook watch history. Retired instructional coach Karen Osher urged guidelines like those in Los Angeles and New York.

Hillcrest Elementary: Parents, teachers and NAACP representatives said staff only recently learned Hillcrest was being considered as a permanent Mandarin immersion site. They cited the school's 350 students and its $7.4M modernization. Speakers supported adding a Mandarin strand but opposed displacing current students. A Hillcrest teacher warned that consolidation could produce a more segregated district.

Why it matters: Each bloc is seeking enforceable policy, not just acknowledgment. The Hillcrest fight also previews the site-by-site conflicts Option C's program mapping could trigger.

---

Minor Items

• Settlements: The board reported six closed-session settlements totaling about $1.93M, including $1M in Feria v. SFUSD.
• Consent calendar: The board approved items F1 through F73 (For: 6, Against: 0), with Kim under a standing recusal.
• Enrollment fair: The 2027-28 enrollment season opens Oct. 23, and the fair moves from Balboa High School to Moscone Center.
• Green schools: Lowell High student Quinn Arthur previewed a policy proposal on green infrastructure for high school campuses.
• Grant access: Daniel Webster PTA's Diana Hall said staff would not let the school apply for an SFPUC greening grant of up to $300,000.

---

Looking ahead: The Nov. 10 design-principles session and the Dec. 1 charter decisions are the next pressure points. Both offer the clearest openings for families to shape boundaries, tiebreakers and program placement before the April vote.