Oakland Unified Board Delays $861K i-Ready Contract Over Privacy Concerns

Oakland Unified's Board of Education put the brakes on a three-year, $861,136.23 contract for the i-Ready learning platform, even though schools are already using it. At a brief Oct. 28 special meeting, the board voted 4-2 to postpone the Curriculum Associates agreement to Nov. 12. Board members said they needed more time to review student data privacy and AI terms in a contract they received the night before.

---

• i-Ready contract postponed 4-2 to the Nov. 12 board meeting
• Privacy, AI-notice terms and late paperwork drove the delay
• Platform stays in use without an approved contract, raising invoice questions
• Parent-facing MyPath restart hinges on approval, a public commenter warned

---

i-Ready Deal Stalls on the Dais

The basics: i-Ready, sold by Curriculum Associates, LLC, is a diagnostic and instruction platform for literacy and math. The proposed customer agreement would run from Oct. 20, 2026, to Oct. 20, 2029, at a cost not to exceed $861,136.23. MyPath is i-Ready's personalized instruction component.

Why it matters: The district already relies on i-Ready to track student progress in grades 1-12. Delaying the contract keeps a core academic tool in use without board approval, while members press for clearer protections on student data and parent opt-out time.

Where things stand: Staff framed the platform as a key source of districtwide data. i-Ready diagnostics in literacy and math run in grades 1-12, and "it is the first time that we've been able to see literacy across 1st through 12th grade," said Chief Academic Officer Sandra Aguilar.

Running the platform without a signed agreement creates a paperwork problem. "I would need to ask our general counsel about us using the platform and not having an approved contract for when we receive invoices," Aguilar said. A second speaker for the district added that the agreement contains additional protections negotiated for the district and its users, protections the district would not have without a contract.

Director Rachel Latta led the push to wait. She cited the short review window, possible changes to the platform, and terms allowing privacy and AI-related changes on 30 days' notice. She also noted that the vendor's price quote is valid through the end of the year. "I would like to understand if there's a reason why we must approve it today," Latta said. Pointing to the timing, she added, "We didn't get this contract until nine p.m. last night." Board members also questioned why invoicing could not simply continue in the meantime.

The other side: Public commenter Brandon Wall urged approval. He said several schools have asked to restart MyPath and that approving the agreement is "a precursor to schools being able to restart the MyPath" program. Wall warned that delay makes it harder to rebuild student habits and said families value seeing their children's reading progress. He also acknowledged the board's concerns.

Procedural snag: The postponement briefly tangled the board in parliamentary procedure. Latta first moved to postpone, but a member objected that the board cannot postpone an item until a motion to approve is on the floor. Board President Jennifer Brouhard then moved to adopt, a member seconded, and Latta renewed her motion to postpone with a second from Board Vice President Valarie Bachelor. The question was called, and the roll call followed.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: The motion to postpone passed. For: 4 (Latta, Director VanCedric Williams, Director Patrice Berry, Bachelor). Against: 2 (Director Clifford Thompson, Brouhard). Absent: 1 (Director Mike Hutchinson). Student directors were absent and are not counted. The vote pits two priorities against each other: the data-privacy scrutiny families and advocates increasingly expect, and teachers' and schools' need for continuity in a tool already built into instruction. In the meantime, Curriculum Associates continues to provide services without a ratified agreement, and district staff must sort out how to handle incoming invoices.

What's next: The contract returns at the Nov. 12 board meeting. Watch whether staff come back with answers on the AI and privacy notice terms, parent opt-out timelines, and general counsel's view on paying invoices before approval. Agenda materials are posted on the district's Legistar matter page for 26-1791.

---

Minor Items

• Solar project extension approved: The board approved Amendment No. 2 with NV5 Consultants, Inc., a time extension only for advisory work on the district's Phase II & III solar PV project. A board member said it adds no cost. For: 5, Against: 0, Absent: 2 (Hutchinson, Berry). There was no public comment.
• Attendance: The board established a quorum with Director Mike Hutchinson and both student directors absent.

---

Looking Ahead

The i-Ready agreement returns Nov. 12, with privacy terms, AI-notice provisions and the status of the platform's unapproved use all expected to be in focus.