Committee Advances Tenant Rights Notices as Advocates Push for Translations

San Francisco tenants in newer buildings may soon get a yearly reminder that state law already caps their rent and limits evictions. On Oct. 26, 2026, the Board of Supervisors' Land Use and Transportation Committee voted 3-0 to send that disclosure ordinance to the full Board, along with four other items, including a Sunset Healthcare Corridor and landmark status for the Jefferson Airplane House.

---

• Tenant notice ordinance advances 3-0, requiring landlords to tell tenants about rent caps and just cause rules
• Advocates push for multilingual notices, and the Rent Board commits to translations
• Noriega Street to become the "Sunset Healthcare Corridor" after amendments and a wall of provider support
• Jefferson Airplane House moves toward landmark status, which would make it the first 1960s band house landmarked in San Francisco
• Rooftop restrooms exempted from height limits to protect top-floor homes in projects like Freedom West 2.0

---

Know Your Rights, in Writing: Dorsey's Tenant Notice Bill

Why it matters: Thousands of San Francisco renters fall outside local rent control but are covered by state protections they may not know exist. This ordinance puts those rights in front of tenants every year.

The basics: Local rent control generally covers buildings with certificates of occupancy issued before June 1979. Supervisor Matt Dorsey noted that the state Tenant Protection Act of 2019, AB 1482, separately limits rent increases to 5% plus CPI or 10% and requires just cause for evictions.

Where things stand: The ordinance requires landlords to deliver an annual notice to tenants or post it in a common area. It directs the Rent Board to publish a standard notice and allows the board to counsel both tenants and landlords. Dorsey summarized the premise: "tenants can only avail themselves of rights they know they have."

Supervisor, District 11, Chyanne Chen co-sponsored the bill and framed it as good for landlords, too. "It helps to level the playing field between those landlords who may be operating in bad faith and those who are playing by the rules," said Chen.

The other side: No one opposed the bill. Supporters did press hard on how it will be carried out:

• Zachary Friel of SOMCAN said notices must be in tenants' own languages. He urged the city to codify translation requirements across Administrative Code Chapter 13.
• Teresa Dolales of SOMCAN cited high rents and evictions, quoted a tenant from a SOMCAN report and called for clear, multilingual notices.
• Mitch Lohmerberg, speaking for the Affordable Housing Alliance and the San Francisco Anti-Displacement Coalition, said tenants in post-1979 buildings may not know state law covers them.
• Jutaporn Chalosheep, a HomeRise board member and resident, backed plain-language, multilingual notices. Chalosheep also asked for a timeline that gives landlords enough time to prepare.

Christina Varner of the San Francisco Rent Board answered the language-access concerns directly. "We would definitely like to be expansive and including all the languages mandated in the language access ordinance in this notification that we will be drafting," said Varner.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: The committee forwarded the ordinance with a positive recommendation (For: 3, Melgar, Chen and Dorsey; Against: 0; Absent: 0).

• Tenants in post-1979 units stand to gain the most.
• Landlords take on a new annual notice duty but get a standard Rent Board form and access to counseling.
• The Rent Board absorbs new drafting, translation and counseling work.
• Tenant groups won a public commitment on translations. Whether translation rules get codified more broadly remains an open question.

What's next: The ordinance heads to the full Board of Supervisors, slated for its Nov. 3, 2026 agenda. Watch for an effective date and whether landlords get the prep time HomeRise requested.

---

Noriega Street Gets a Healthcare Brand

Why it matters: The Sunset has long lacked hospitals. Supporters say naming its clinic strip could draw more doctors and more foot traffic for small businesses.

Where things stand: Supervisor, District 4, Alan Wong said the Sunset has been underserved by hospitals and counted more than 30 providers along Noriega Street. He described the designation as a recruiting tool as much as a tribute: "we are honoring the providers who have served our community for decades while encouraging more healthcare services to locate here so more residents can access quality care close to home."

Wong offered two amendments:

• The first clarifies that the designation covers Noriega Street between 19th and 33rd avenues.
• The second asks SFMTA to install commemorative signs at both endpoints, with flexibility on where the signs go.

Chen said her own district has a similar lack of hospitals and urgent care. She then joined as co-sponsor.

A provider chorus: Every public commenter supported the resolution, and the speakers came overwhelmingly from the local healthcare industry:

• Dr. Joseph Wu, President of All American Medical Group, which has more than 300 physicians, highlighted the legacy of independent Noriega doctors.
• Han Zhu, an internist practicing in the Sunset since 1993, said neighborhood care lets elderly patients walk to appointments. Zhu cited a pop-up COVID vaccine clinic and said he hopes young doctors will join the corridor.
• Paul Fox of Northeast Medical Services said NEMS is opening a new pharmacy on Noriega Street. NEMS speakers also described its multilingual primary care, optometry, radiology and lab services.
• Larry Liu, CEO of Chinese Community Health Plan, also spoke for Chinese Hospital. Liu said the corridor supports aging at home and helps small licensed practices survive.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: Chen moved both the amendment and the amended resolution. One roll call covered both motions, and each passed (For: 3, Melgar, Chen and Dorsey; Against: 0; Absent: 0).

• Independent practices and immigrant-serving providers gain visibility.
• Seniors and immigrant families are the stated beneficiaries.
• SFMTA picks up the signage task.

What's next: The amended resolution goes to the full Board, slated for Nov. 3, 2026.

---

A Landmark for the San Francisco Sound

Why it matters: The city has few landmarks tied to the 1960s counterculture. Planning staff said this one would set a precedent.

Where things stand: Angelina Yu of Supervisor Connie Chan's office described 2400 Fulton Street in the Inner Richmond as a rehearsal, songwriting and gathering space central to the "San Francisco Sound."

Alex Westhoff of the San Francisco Planning Department tied the designation to two efforts: the city's 2024 counterculture historic context statement and the Family Zoning Plan Landmark Program. Westhoff said the band bought the house in 1968 and that the 1904 Classical Revival building remains intact. The Historic Preservation Commission recommended designation on Sept. 2, 2026. "If designated, the Jefferson Airplane House would be the first band house from this period to receive landmark designation," said Westhoff.

The basics: Article 10 landmark status subjects future exterior changes to historic preservation review.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: Owner Paul Curtin spoke in support, which removes the usual friction of owner opposition. Dorsey added himself as co-sponsor with a joke: "I'm gonna have one sibling angry at me if I don't add myself."

Dorsey moved the ordinance, and it passed (For: 3, Melgar, Chen and Dorsey; Against: 0; Absent: 0). No members of the public commented.

What's next: The ordinance goes to the full Board, slated for Nov. 3, 2026.

---

Rooftop Restrooms Won't Cost Housing Units

Why it matters: A plumbing-code crackdown threatened to take top-floor space, potentially housing units, from height-limited projects. That includes Freedom West 2.0, a senior affordable housing project.

Where things stand: Raynell Cooper, legislative aide to Supervisor Bilal Mahmood, explained the problem. The Department of Building Inspection has stepped up enforcement of a rule requiring a restroom on the same floor as a rooftop public space, on the roof itself or one floor below. Freedom West 2.0 planned to build to its maximum height. The ordinance "works by adding restrooms servicing rooftop public areas to the list of items that are exempt from height limits," said Cooper. That puts the restrooms alongside railings and elevator penthouses under Planning Code Section 260.

Tate Hanna of the San Francisco Planning Department said the Planning Commission "adopted a recommendation of approval without any modifications" on Oct. 1.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: Supervisor, District 7, Myrna Melgar, the committee chair, moved the item, and it passed (For: 3, Melgar, Chen and Dorsey; Against: 0; Absent: 0). No members of the public commented.

• Affordable housing developers keep their unit counts.
• Residents keep access to rooftop amenities.

What's next: The ordinance goes to the full Board, slated for Nov. 3, 2026.

---

Minor Items

• 150 Bronte Street encroachment: The committee voted 3-0 to recommend revocable permission for property owner Ava Jamshidnejad to build five 4-foot retaining walls, a roughly 20-foot sewer lateral, a curb and three bollards in an unimproved right-of-way. Gregory Slocum of San Francisco Public Works said reviewing agencies raised no objections, and no members of the public commented.

---

Looking Ahead

All five items are slated for the full Board of Supervisors' Nov. 3, 2026 agenda. The tenant notice ordinance merits the closest watching. Key questions are how quickly the Rent Board can produce translated notices and how much lead time landlords will get.