Louisville Accepts $107M State Allocation for Downtown, Zoo and Infrastructure

The Louisville Metro Budget Committee moved swiftly through a six-item agenda Thursday, but the marquee action was authorizing the mayor to accept $107.25 million in state capital funding — a signal that the city's fiscal relationship with Frankfort continues to warm. The committee also cleaned up misplaced budget line items, preserved lawn services for District 1 residents, and approved three district fund transfers totaling $85,000.

• Louisville authorized to accept $107.25 million from Kentucky for downtown infrastructure, zoo expansion, Cedar Creek improvements and a first responders driving track
• EIF budget fix carries forward District 1 lawn maintenance money so residents already approved for services aren't cut off at fiscal year's end
• Three districts shift a combined $85,000 from neighborhood and capital funds to cover staffing, events and travel through December

---

$107M in State Capital Funding Heads to Louisville

Why it matters: The allocation represents the largest single state funding authorization on the committee's agenda and marks what members described as an improving ratio of state tax dollars flowing back to Louisville — a longstanding sore spot for the city's delegation in Frankfort.

Where things stand: Seth Drake, senior advisor for intergovernmental affairs in the mayor's office, presented Resolution 097-26 authorizing Louisville Metro to accept up to $107,250,000 from the Kentucky Department for Local Government. The money was appropriated during the most recent legislative session.

"The projects range from across downtown infrastructure improvements to bipartisan infrastructure priorities on Oak Street and Fourth corridor, Cedar Creek improvements along Bardstown Road, funding for the zoo maintenance expansion and maintenance priorities that they have as well. And then of course, the first responders driving track in southwest Louisville," said Seth Drake, senior advisor for intergovernmental affairs.

Councilman Piagetini used the moment to put Louisville's fiscal position in context, praising both the General Assembly and the mayor's advocacy. "We still wildly overfund the state compared to dollars that come back to the city. But we have seen that improve as a ratio of what it's been historically over the last couple sessions," he said. He added that General Assembly leadership had assured rural constituents that "the lion's share of money was going to rural areas and areas of need across the state."

Decisions: The resolution passed unanimously by voice vote (9-0; Councilman Winkler absent).

---

Budget Cleanup Saves District 1 Lawn Services

The basics: During the FY2025–2026 budget process, council members directed funding through the Equity Investment Fund (EIF) mechanism to specific projects. When the administration received detailed documentation of intended uses, it discovered some projects had been placed in the wrong departments.

Why it matters: The ordinance corrects those misplacements — moving allocations between departments without adding or subtracting from the total budget. But an amendment added real stakes: without it, residents in District 1 who were already approved for lawn maintenance services would have lost funding when the fiscal year closed.

Chair Kevin Kramer, District 11, explained the reallocation: "It really doesn't fit in the department we put it in. In order to do what you really wanted to do, we would need to move it. It doesn't add anything to the budget. It doesn't take anything away from the budget. All it does is move allocations from one department to another."

On behalf of absent Councilwoman Hawkins (District 1), Kramer introduced an amendment carrying forward unexpended lawn maintenance funds into FY2026–2027. "There are folks who are in line for the services that are to be provided. The services haven't yet been provided. And so if that money lapses, then those folks who are counting on this won't be able to — it won't happen," he said.

Decisions: The amendment passed by voice vote; the amended ordinance passed 9-0 by roll call. Because it was amended in committee, the ordinance goes to old business rather than the consent calendar.

---

Three Districts Shift $85K for Staff, Events and Travel

Three separate ordinances moved money from Neighborhood Development Funds or Capital Infrastructure Funds into council operations accounts — routine housekeeping that reveals how members stretch limited district budgets for constituent services.

District 7 — $20,000 (Ordinance 216-26): Councilwoman McCraney, District 7, said the transfer covers part-time staff, a constituent mailing, and the district's annual tour visiting data centers and Oxmoor Farms. "I need money to continue to pay my part-time staff. And I have a mailing that needs to go out and to pay for it," she said. Approved 9-0.

District 11 — $5,000 (Ordinance 201-26): Chair Kevin Kramer, District 11, disclosed that his role as president of the National League of Cities led to an appointment to the Sister Cities International board of directors. Unlike NLC, Sister Cities does not fund board travel. "Sister Cities does not fund the travel for their board members," Kramer explained. The $5,000 covers potential travel costs. Approved 9-0.

District 3 — $60,000 (Ordinance 217-26): Councilwoman Parrish Wright, District 3, moved $60,000 from her Capital Infrastructure Fund to the Neighborhood Development Fund to cover staff, monthly advisory board meetings, good neighbor awards, community sporting events, and other programs. "We have a lot of activities in our high-needs district. And this is my outgoing season," she said, adding that her office publishes an annual accounting of all NDF expenditures. Approved 9-0.

All three ordinances go to the consent calendar.

---

Minor Items

• FY27 bond reimbursement resolution (Resolution 092-26): An annual procedural resolution allowing Metro to begin capital projects funded by general obligation bond proceeds before the bonds are issued, likely next summer. Ms. Dunn, staff, confirmed this is standard practice. Approved unanimously by voice vote.

• Councilman Winkler was excused absent from all votes; all remaining nine members voted yes on every item.