Locunity — where decisions happen.
Belvedere Council Moves to Deny Two-Gate Driveway License on Golden Gate

Belvedere Council Moves to Deny Two-Gate Driveway License on Golden Gate

City Council • BelvedereOctober 12, 2026

Sources:

Locunity is an independent informational service and is not an official government page for this commission. All information is sourced from public footage and an analysis of official agendas with the aid of responsible, fact-checked AI. to report an error or omission.

Belvedere's City Council spent nearly 90 minutes on Oct. 12, 2026, on a single driveway at 421 Golden Gate Avenue, and the debate turned into a statement about who controls the city's narrow public roads. A motion to deny the property's right-of-way license was moved and seconded, and an "aye" was heard. The council also pressed staff for a flood-barrier plan ahead of a forecast super El Niño winter, while Mallard Point demolition continues under appeal.


  • Motion to deny 421 Golden Gate license moved and seconded after four councilmembers said they could not approve it
  • Temporary flood barriers to a 9.2-foot elevation in design, with an actionable plan expected in November
  • Mallard Point demolition proceeds without a stay while a resident group's appeal waits for a hearing
  • Police chief details Flock camera safeguards as council presses on outside data access
  • Drone delivery ordinance tabled, and residents call for an outright ban

A Driveway Becomes a Right-of-Way Referendum

The basics: A revocable license (RL) lets a property owner place improvements in the public right-of-way. The city can withdraw that permission.

Why it matters: The two-gate design at 421 Golden Gate had already cleared Planning Commission design review. If the license is denied, the applicant cannot use the driveways as designed, which sets entitlements against the council's control of the road.

Where things stand: A staff presenter said the Planning Commission approved design review and demolition permits on March 17 to build a new single-family residence. Planning Commission Chair Alex Seidel explained how he came to accept the modified design: "I ultimately came to feel that parking additional cars behind the landscape screen was probably preferable."

Sean Condrey, the applicant's civil engineer, defended the plan with a turning-radius analysis. "I think the record shows that the 2-gate design actually answers that concern better than the alternative," said Condrey.

The other side: Neighbors disputed the measurements. John Owen, a public commenter, said the encroachment was never authorized and neighbors were never consulted. "The road is down to 12 feet wide at that point," said Owen. Marshall Miller, a public commenter, rejected the claim that backing out of a single driveway is dangerous. "So there's no safety issue whatsoever in backing out of their driveway, and I wanted to make that point," said Miller. Dan Hunter, a public commenter, said the drawings are wrong and trash trucks cannot pass. "There are no smaller driveway gates on anything we have," said Hunter.

Decisions and stakeholder impacts: The council came down against the license. Vice Mayor Kevin Burke cited Policy 11.7. "A single curb cut provides complete access to the garage and required off-street parking," said Burke. Councilmember Jane Cooper said council members "are committed to keeping the public roadways as wide as possible." Councilmember Peter Mark said "as presented to us, this is not an approvable RL," although he disagreed with colleagues on landscaping. Councilmember Pat Carapiet pointed to measurement and safety concerns. "I agree that there are enough concerns regarding this RL that we can't approve it," said Carapiet.

A motion to deny was moved and seconded, and an "aye" was heard. The result was not announced, and no tally or names of the mover and seconder were recorded. Official minutes will confirm the outcome.

The same theme came up earlier in the night. A license at 331 Golden Gate was continued for a month after council members objected to bluestone paving in the right-of-way and favored asphalt. The contractor argued the license would be meaningless without the bluestone. One member recused from that item.

What's next: The city's legal counsel advised that the 421 license will have to return to council "one way or the other for a final decision." The 331 Golden Gate license returns next month.


Bracing for a Super El Niño

Why it matters: County and utility officials warned that king tides and severe storms may overlap the holidays. They also warned that outside help could be slow if storms hit the whole region, which shifts more responsibility to residents.

Where things stand: Steven Torrence, Director of Emergency Management, Marin County Office of Emergency Management, described an updated countywide emergency operations plan. He also described new Alert Marin groups for coastal flooding and said Marin sign-up rates are above 40%. "We sent out another alert today to advise the public of the extension of the high tides," said Torrence.

Mark van Gorder, liaison for Pacific Gas and Electric, stressed roadway access, the limits of mutual aid and preparing for outages. His message to residents was to "prepare now."

Tony Boyd of Belvedere Public Works said the city is working with Stetson Engineers on temporary barriers for San Rafael Avenue and Beach Road. Engineers "have pointed to 9.2 feet, which is the 50-year flood elevation," said Boyd. Options under consideration:

  • Bladders, which would likely take several days to deploy
  • Sandbags
  • Rigid barriers

Boyd said "the costs that I've seen are certainly within the existing authority of the City Manager," and he expected an order that week. He also outlined routine storm preparations and the Belvedere Lagoon Property Owners Association's (BLPOA) protocol for lowering the lagoon.

The other side: Vice Mayor Burke asked for a full picture of what the city will do, what it will support and what residents must do themselves. Councilmember Mark worried about gaps in coverage. "It would be frustrating to have put these systems in place, giving people a sense of confidence that it's going to protect against something, and then it not work," said Mark.

Residents questioned the design standard. Hunter warned "we very likely will have a 100-year event." He also flagged overhead lines on Golden Gate Avenue as a wildfire evacuation hazard. Bill Rothman, a public commenter, cautioned that barriers could trap water and worsen lagoon flooding, including backflooding from Tiburon. He also asked how tall the barriers would be.

What's next: The council expects an actionable barrier plan at its November meeting.


Mallard Point Demolition Rolls On During Appeal

Why it matters: Demolition could be finished before the appeal is heard. Residents and some councilmembers fear the council's decision will be overtaken by events during a heavy winter.

Where things stand: City Manager Robert Zadnik said contractors are at work now that the bulkhead permit has been issued. He also reported:

  • The fire department is training on site.
  • Foth is reviewing plans.
  • Belvedere Residents for Intelligent Growth (BRIG) filed an appeal the week before the meeting.
  • Residents reported salvage activity on the weekend.
  • Staff is sending residents weekly updates.

Staff believes the permit was not issued in error, and "we don't have grounds to stay or pause the project," said Zadnik. Councilmembers asked how residents can reach Foth. They also noted that the longer the appeal waits, the less meaningful it becomes.

The other side: Jim Hornthal, a public commenter, urged a prompt hearing. He noted that the BLPOA sign-off condition remains unsatisfied and asked who is liable if the project fails, given that the developer is an LLC with limited insurance. "I'm not sure where, quote unquote, the buck stops if in fact this disaster, which is N greater than 0%, happens," said Hornthal. Jill Barnett, speaking for BRIG, asked the council to postpone demolition until the rainy season ends.

What's next: Staff intends to hear the appeal on or before the next meeting, without a stay.


Flock Cameras Under the Microscope

The basics: Flock is an automated license plate reader (ALPR) system.

Where things stand: Police Chief Jason Wu presented third-quarter statistics and data collected under California's Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA). He described the city's six cameras, a public transparency portal and revisions to its data-sharing agreements. "All license plate images captured by our camera are automatically and permanently deleted after 30 days," said Wu. He said data is shared with seven Marin agencies and no federal agencies, and the city has turned off Flock's network discoverability so other California agencies cannot find Belvedere's cameras.

The other side: Councilmember Mark cited data breaches in Mountain View and San Francisco. His concern is "the unknown use of our data by outside agencies, authorized or otherwise," said Mark. Rothman suggested an outside expert review how well the system protects data shared with other agencies.


Drone Ordinance Pulled, Opposition Grows

Why it matters: The city can regulate ground-based delivery hubs but not airspace, which the FAA controls. Residents want tougher limits on noise, privacy and wildlife impacts.

Where things stand: The second reading was tabled before the meeting, so there was no staff report or vote. Rothman said the change was not communicated through a revised agenda email.

The other side: Charles Comer, a public commenter, cited noise of 92.1 decibels, frequent flights and disturbance to birds. "I would recommend that the drone deliveries be completely banned," said Comer. Another commenter thanked the council for acting early but said "these ordinances do not go far enough," asking for an outright ban on hubs or noise limits and setbacks. A third commenter, citing property values, privacy and noise, said: "I would plead with you to vote for a total ban on this project." Ken Johnson, a public commenter, welcomed the delay so the city can gather more information.

What's next: The ordinance returns on a future agenda. Rothman asked for a community meeting with longer speaking times first and suggested daily time limits on flights.


Minor Items

  • Finance Committee: Arianne Mahler was appointed by voice vote. She brings 38 years in finance and fills a seat previously held by John Wilton.
  • Consent calendar: Items 5A through 5G passed by voice vote.
  • Police staffing: Two recruits, one full-time and one reserve, are in background checks and could start in January or February. An outside firm will study the policing model, including consolidation or a joint powers authority with Tiburon.
  • Beach Road: In week 11, crews are doing night work on sheet piles with completion targeted around the end of November. The project may draw on contingency funds.

Looking Ahead

The November meeting is shaping up to be busy. It is expected to include the flood-barrier plan, the BRIG appeal on or before that date, the return of the 331 Golden Gate license and a contract request for the police study.