Board of Supervisors - Jul 28, 2026 - Special Meeting

Board of Supervisors - Jul 28, 2026 - Special Meeting

Board of SupervisorsAlameda CountyJuly 28, 2026

Sources:

Locunity is a independent informational service and is not an official government page for this commission.We use AI-assisted analysis and human editorial review to publish information.

Board Grapples With $504M Infrastructure Gap, $10M Immigration Office and Child Welfare Crisis

The Alameda County Board of Supervisors convened a marathon special meeting that stretched past 11 hours, confronting a cascade of long-deferred decisions — from crumbling jail facilities and a half-billion-dollar capital funding gap to the question of whether the county can afford a permanent office for its 500,000-plus immigrant residents. Underneath every agenda item ran a common thread: one-time money is running out, and the Board has yet to agree on how to pay for what comes next.

  • $2.5 billion capital plan reveals $504M funding gap; Board directs staff to revive a pre-COVID real estate master plan and explore bond financing
  • Consultants propose a $10M Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs with seven staff; supervisors express support for the mission but skepticism about the price tag
  • Child welfare vacancy rate drops to 21% but timely investigations are declining; a corrective action plan is due to the state by Oct. 1
  • Russell City reparations fund shifts to County Auditor-Controller after nonprofit fiscal partner exits; two elders died before receiving payments
  • County closes $185M budget gap with $93M in one-time pension savings, setting up a structural deficit for next year
  • Board settles Chew v. County of Alameda for $250,000 in unanimous closed-session vote

Half a Billion Dollars Short: The County's Infrastructure Reckoning

GSA Director Kimberly Gasaway laid out the county's five-year Capital Improvement Plan: $2.5 billion in estimated costs across the General Services Agency ($1.5 billion), Public Works ($972 million), and smaller Tier 1 projects ($6 million). Identified revenue covers $1.6 billion, leaving a $914 million initial gap narrowed to $504 million by tapping $410 million in the Special Capital Construction Fund.

Why it matters: The county's physical plant is aging fast. Santa Rita Jail, now 38 years old, alone accounts for $428 million in board-approved projects spanning ADA upgrades, network infrastructure, outdoor recreation areas mandated by the Baboo consent decree, behavioral health treatment pods, kitchen renovation, and a critical operations progressive design-build contract awarded in June 2026 with completion expected in 2030. Several projects are in financial closeout; the kitchen renovation is in design for a 2027 completion.

Where things stand: Supervisor Nate Miley was the first to name what others were circling: "If we don't pursue some of this stuff, it's not like it's going to get easier and it's not like it's going to get less expensive." He suggested the county may need to issue bonds within two to four years.

Supervisor Lena Tam pressed on the math: "You're trying to close a $914 million budget gap in your capital plan." She questioned the bond timeline and noted the county's favorable credit rating should be leveraged.

Board President David Haubert pushed hardest, asking GSA to revive a pre-COVID real estate master plan that included a potential new government center downtown. "If we're not going to do it today, when do we plan for a 500 million, 1 billion, 2 billion, 3 billion for everything that we need to get done," he said. Gasaway confirmed significant pre-COVID work had been completed, including a committee and consultant engagement.

Supervisor Elisa Marquez requested a procurement and contracting work session for the fall.

What's next: The Board directed staff to return with an updated facilities needs assessment and the revived master plan. A formal board letter for the CIP is expected at a subsequent meeting. A bond measure — the county's first since 2018 — appears increasingly likely, though no timeline has been set.


A Permanent Home for Immigrant Services — But at What Cost?

Supervisor Marquez introduced the long-awaited implementation study for a proposed Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs, noting that "one in three community members are immigrants. So it's really important that we strengthen the infrastructure."

The basics: Consultants Sangeeta Kumar and Alex Deschental presented findings from a study seeded by the Zellerbach, Akonadi, San Francisco, and East Bay Community foundations. The study included peer jurisdiction scans, department interviews, community focus groups, and a Community Advisory Board that proposed eight core functions: community partnerships, needs assessment, a navigation hub, policy development, communications, and more.

Where things stand: The recommended budget is approximately $10 million. The largest share would renew existing coalition contracts — with groups including ACCORD, AKUDIR, API Legal Outreach, and SIRI — that expire in September 2026. Seven staff positions and $450,000 in operating costs round out the plan. The office would initially be housed within the Social Services Agency, though the advisory board aspires to independent status.

Social Services Agency Director Andrea Ford confirmed that a nine-month contract extension is planned while a formal RFP runs. Three positions have already been funded and one hire — Charles Sanchez — has been made.

The other side: The price tag drew pointed questions. Supervisor Miley said plainly: "I'm not sure if I support $10 million. I need to get a sense of what the allocation would be for." He suggested starting with two to three staff.

President Haubert was more blunt: "Can we afford $10 million? What would we not be able to do, services wise, if we do fund this? Because money comes from somewhere." He also raised concerns about fraud monitoring and accountability, while acknowledging refugees' vulnerability.

Supervisor Tam emphasized coordination gaps and urged further discussion at the Board retreat: "The need to strengthen the countywide and the coordination of services is really important because the model that we typically have worked with in social services since I joined the board was we rely very heavily on nonprofits and community based organizations to provide those services."

African Immigrant Community Demands a Seat at the Table

Three public commenters during this item highlighted critical gaps in the current service model. Alma Sidigo, founder of the Global Communication Education and Art (GCA)/African Resource Center, argued that African immigrants are excluded from existing funding and resources. She said GCA serves over 500 people on legal services, has conducted 23 know-your-rights sessions without outside support, and responds to 20 to 30 calls daily.

Desmond Jeffries of GCA made a specific ask: a three-year, $450,000 annual African Immigrant Community Stabilization Initiative covering housing, case management, mental health, and community healing. He cited GCA serving 1,700 individuals, reaching over 25,000 community members, housing 84 people, and completing more than 700 medical enrollments — and noted that no African languages appear on the county website's language assistance page.

Jane Pack, co-executive director of Refugee and Immigrant Transitions, urged the Board to think beyond emergency defense: refugees, she noted, have no home to return to if federal policy drives self-deportation.

Supervisor Fortunato Bas highlighted her engagement around access to due process, including support for the Public Defender's Immigration Unit, and called for data on deportations by country of origin.

What's next: The full report will be distributed to supervisors next week, with further discussion expected at the Board retreat. Coalition contracts expire September 2026, and the nine-month extension will come to the Board before expiration.


Child Welfare Staffing Improves, but Investigations Lag Behind

Michelle Love, assistant agency director for Children and Family Services, delivered update No. 11 on the department's response to a 2023 grand jury report, a 2025 state audit, and a July 2026 state on-site review. Seven of 15 audit recommendations are complete; eight remain pending.

Why it matters: The vacancy rate has dropped from 32.8% to 21% — real progress — but the numbers tell a more complicated story. "There were 196 applications for child welfare worker ones in the 26.3 class, but only 61 of those met the minimum requirements and only 6 were hired," Love reported. Bachelor's-level applicants far outnumber master's-level candidates, and timely investigation rates are trending in the wrong direction.

Where things stand: A corrective action plan is due to the California Department of Social Services by Oct. 1, with an 18-month implementation timeline and biweekly state meetings. The department has hired a recruitment strategist through Millennium Consulting and is working with Casey Family Programs. San Diego State University has expressed interest in evaluating the emergency response program. Victor Community BCS Services holds the family-finding contract, and 58% of foster children are placed with relatives through kinship care.

Political Friction With Sacramento

The discussion took a sharp turn when Love described being personally targeted by a state senator. "On her website there are videos of me looking like I'm on the first floor. And so unintentionally I have been put in the position of wanting to defend the county," she said, referencing altered videos.

President Haubert was visibly concerned: "I'm very concerned when I hear you say that and I'm very concerned that you — now for the first time, I'm understanding there are videos of you posted online at these meetings where a state senator is getting visibly angry at you." He pushed back broadly on state mandates that increase workload without full funding.

Supervisor Fortunato Bas pressed for a more direct response to labor's call for a recruitment and retention plan: "I know that our labor partners have asked about creating a recruitment and retention plan with financial incentives and measurable goals. That has not been addressed very directly."

Supervisor Fortunato Bas also emphasized that child welfare is a massive responsibility, and the Board should be more responsive to union concerns from SEIU Local 1021 and Local 21.

What's next: The corrective action plan is due Oct. 1. Biweekly meetings with CDSS will continue. The Board signaled it wants to see a formal recruitment and retention plan with financial incentives at a future meeting.


Russell City Reparations: Urgency Mounts as Elders Pass

Supervisor Marquez provided an update on the Russell City Redress Fund, a city-county partnership providing direct payments to former residents and descendants of Russell City — a multiracial community of more than 1,400 residents displaced through eminent domain in the 1960s.

Why it matters: Philanthropic Ventures Foundation has withdrawn as fiscal partner. County Auditor-Controller Melissa Wilk has agreed to hold and distribute payments, saving the 2% administrative fee for beneficiaries.

The urgency is personal. "In the last month, we've lost two elders from Russell City, one being 104 years old, and that was Jose Cota and Jessie Mae Johnson," Supervisor Marquez said.

Decisions: The MOU establishing governance for the working group and application subcommittee will come before the Board on Aug. 4 as a set matter. The City of Hayward will sign its MOU on Aug. 18.


$6.8B Budget Balanced — for Now

Staff presented the final FY 2026-27 budget totaling approximately $6.8 billion across all funds ($4.3 billion general fund), roughly 10% over the prior year. The county closed a $185 million maintenance-of-effort gap through $93 million in retirement savings from pension prepayments and $60 million in departmental reductions.

Why it matters: Staff warned explicitly that one-time strategies will roll into next year's gap. At the state level, the June 29 budget preserves HAP funding continuation and eligibility/enrollment support. But five November 2026 ballot initiatives could reshape the county's fiscal picture — covering affordable housing, CEQA reform, borrowing authority, education and healthcare funding, and local tax authority. Federal uncertainty continues with a temporary continuing resolution and potential deep cuts to healthcare and safety net programs.

President Haubert was blunt about the county's revenue options: "I am skeptical that any future parcel tax ballot measurements, sales tax revenue enhancements will be successful in the near future. Very skeptical. We have to really show that we're spending the money that we have effectively and efficiently."

Supervisor Marquez urged the county to own its narrative: "We need to be setting the record straight on what this county is doing. There is a lot of work that we need to build upon and improve, but there's also a lot of great work coming from this county and we need to be telling our own story and correcting the record." She called for tracking fee increases, reserve fund transparency, a Care First Jails Last cost analysis, settlement cost review, and hiring a public information officer.

Supervisor Fortunato Bas flagged a "billionaires tax" ballot measure for PAL committee review: "I know I had brought forward and the board approved the so called billionaires tax that did qualify. It's on the ballot. I would like to bring that back to PAL so that we can officially approve it now that it's on the ballot."


Minor Items

  • Chew v. County of Alameda settlement: Board unanimously approved a $250,000 settlement (Case No. 24CV097781) during closed session on June 2. (For: 5 — Haubert, Tam, Miley, Marquez, Fortunato Bas; Against: 0; Absent: 0.)
  • Brown Act allegations: A public commenter alleged the Board posted the special meeting agenda with only 23 hours' notice (24 required), scheduled duplicate items across morning and afternoon sessions, and routinely starts meetings late.
  • Closed session: The Board returned to closed session for additional business on labor negotiations, litigation matters, and Coliseum real property negotiations. No further reportable action was taken.